Cover page

Summary

Introduction

Catchment

Method

Analysis

Modelling

Discussion

Conclusions

Recommendations

Appendices

References



 

The impact of climate change on rainfall and
streamflow in the Denmark River catchment

Summary

Climate projections indicate that Western Australia's south-west region is likely to become drier in the next century. At the same time development is expected to expand. An increasing water demand with a diminishing water supply poses a serious challenge for water resource managers. One of the first steps in assessing this risk is to establish an estimate of water availability under a drying climate. This report details the findings of an investigation to assess surface-water availability in the Denmark River catchment under a range of projected future climate scenarios.

The results of this study were derived by analysing the response of a hydrologic model (LUCICAT) of the Denmark River catchment to general circulation model (GCM MK3.5) downscaled rainfall for three emissions scenarios defined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): high - A2; moderate - A1B; and low - B1. The hydrologic model was driven with 40 downscaled rainfall sequences from 1975 to 2100 for each emissions scenario.

It was found that under a high greenhouse gas emissions scenario (A2), a rainfall decline of 3 per cent by 2030 could lead to a streamflow reduction of 13.5 per cent, while an 8 per cent reduction in rainfall by 2085 could result in a 32.5 per cent reduction in streamflow. Rainfall and streamflow reductions for a low emissions scenario (B1) would be similar to the high emissions scenario in 2030, at 2.5 and 10 per cent respectively. However, by 2085 the effect of the low emissions scenario would be more apparent, with smaller rainfall and streamflow reductions at 2 and 8 per cent respectively.

There was a slight shift in seasonality between projected and observed rainfall towards more rainfall later in the year. The shift in seasonality was amplified in the streamflow results. This is a similar result to previous climate change studies in south-west Western Australia (Berti et al. 2004; Kitsios et al. 2008). However, unlike the two previous studies, there was no shift in the peak rainfall month in the Denmark River catchment.

The northern portion of the catchment historically experiences less rainfall and was found to be more sensitive to future rainfall decline than the south. For instance, by 2085 (A2 scenario) streamflow was projected to reduce by 57 per cent at Kompup, compared with a 32.5 per cent reduction at Mt Lindesay due to projected rainfall alone.

Land-use change may have a greater impact on streamflow than projected climate change in the Denmark River catchment. A simulation, using repetition of observed rainfall (1971-2005), was undertaken to assess the sensitivity of the catchment to land-use change. Plantations, found mostly in the northern portion of the catchment, have a large impact on streamflow. After setting plantation conditions to 'fully grown' in the model in 2006, there was a sharp decline in streamflow to 2030. The northern portion of the catchment was most sensitive to land use with a streamflow decline of 63 per cent at Kompup, compared with 30 per cent at Mt Lindesay.

Rainfall and streamflow reductions for the end-of-century timeframe were much lower for the B1 scenario than for the A2 and A1B scenarios. These results suggest that streamflow reduction in the Denmark River can be minimised through conscious global efforts to improve technology, social equity and to protect the environment (all aspects represented in the B1 emissions scenario). However, any changes would need to start now given they take a long time to produce an effect.

The greenhouse gas emissions scenarios used in this study are not predictions of the future. They are only projections of possible outcomes of a range of social, economic and environmental developments. While reducing emissions to a low emissions pathway (such as the B1 scenario) appears to be the most beneficial option, it is also the most challenging given we are currently following an emissions growth pathway higher than the A2 scenario.

Even though this study provides evidence that regional impacts of future climate change can be reduced by making large (global) efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions now; some effects of a drying climate are unavoidable and need to be incorporated into future water planning.


© Copyright 2007 All rights reserved